Kansas has one of the broadest identification demands in the country written into its stop statute. It also has no penalty attached to it, which is the part that gets officers in trouble.
Kansas Stop and Identify (K.S.A. 22-2402)
K.S.A. 22-2402 lets you demand a name, an address and an explanation of the person’s actions. It creates no offense and no penalty for refusing any of them. The charging lever in Kansas is K.S.A. 21-5904, interference with law enforcement, and it requires something more than silence: false information, obstruction, or fleeing.

What K.S.A. 22-2402 actually says
- “Without making an arrest, a law enforcement officer may stop any person in a public place whom such officer reasonably suspects is committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime and may demand of the name, address of such suspect and an explanation of such suspect’s actions.”
- Two gates: a public place, and reasonable suspicion of a crime. Both have to exist before the demand is lawful.
- One thing that is not there: a penalty. Nothing in 22-2402 makes refusal a crime. It is investigative authority, not arrest authority. The section has not been amended since 1990.
The real lever — K.S.A. 21-5904
- False information. Interference with law enforcement covers falsely reporting to an officer “any information, knowing that such information is false and intending to influence, impede or obstruct such officer’s or agency’s duty.” A false name during a lawful stop fits. Silence does not.
- Fleeing on foot. The statute separately reaches knowingly fleeing from an officer — other than by motor vehicle — and expressly cross-references a 22-2402 stop.
- Do not charge interference for going quiet. Tie the charge to a false statement, a false report, or flight — conduct the statute names.
The grades are not a single number
- False information is a class A nonperson misdemeanor — but a severity level 9 nonperson felony when the underlying matter is a felony.
- Fleeing on foot is a class A nonperson misdemeanor, a severity level 7 felony in a felony case, and a severity level 5 felony if a firearm was discharged or used while fleeing.
- Which grade applies turns on the crime you were investigating when he lied or ran. Charge the felony tier only when the underlying matter actually supports it — and say which one it was in the narrative.
The federal floor underneath it
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — reasonable suspicion is the floor for the stop, and it must be particularized to the person in front of you.
- Hiibel, 542 U.S. 177 (2004) — states may criminalize refusing to give a name during a lawful stop. Kansas has not done it. Hiibel permits such a statute; it does not supply one where the legislature declined.
Where the Kansas cases actually land
- State v. Morlock, 289 Kan. 980, 218 P.3d 801 (2009) — travel-plan questions to both driver and passenger are within the scope of a stop. Adopting Arizona v. Johnson, the court held that inquiries into matters unrelated to the justification for the stop do not necessarily require their own reasonable suspicion, so long as they do not measurably extend its duration.
- If you were taught that Morlock limits you to the original justification, you were taught it backwards — that was the argument the court rejected, and it reversed the Court of Appeals to say so.
- State v. Jimenez, 308 Kan. 315, 420 P.3d 464 (2018) — this is the duration rule: authority for the seizure ends when the tasks tied to the infraction are, or reasonably should have been, completed. Morlock predates Rodriguez (2015) and should not be cited for how long you can hold someone.
- Both cases reason on Fourth Amendment grounds — the federal floor applied in Kansas, not a separate and stricter state rule.
How it plays out on the street
Reasonable suspicion of a burglary, public sidewalk, and the man you stop folds his arms and says nothing. That is the whole encounter: no crime has occurred. You may hold him for the reasonable time your investigation takes, but the silence itself is not interference and is not an arrest. The moment he hands you a name that turns out to belong to someone else, the analysis changes — now you have 21-5904, and the grade depends on whether the burglary you were working is a felony.
Frequently asked questions
Do you have to identify yourself to police in Kansas?
K.S.A. 22-2402 allows an officer with reasonable suspicion to demand your name, address and an explanation of your actions in a public place, but the statute attaches no penalty to refusing. Refusal alone is not a crime in Kansas.
What is the charge for giving a false name to police in Kansas?
Interference with law enforcement under K.S.A. 21-5904. It is a class A nonperson misdemeanor, or a severity level 9 nonperson felony when the matter being investigated is a felony.
Is running from police on foot a crime in Kansas?
Yes. K.S.A. 21-5904 covers knowingly fleeing from a law enforcement officer other than by motor vehicle, and cross-references a stop under 22-2402. It is a class A misdemeanor, a severity level 7 felony in a felony case, and a severity level 5 felony if a firearm is discharged or used while fleeing.
Related
- Hiibel v. Nevada (2004): Can You Arrest Someone for Refusing to Give Their Name?
- Texas Failure to Identify: Silence Isn't the Offense — a False Name Is
- Wisconsin Stop and Identify: Refusing Isn't Obstructing
- Does New Jersey Have a Stop and Identify Law? What You Can Actually Demand
- Kansas police field reference — statutes, case law and field guides
Carry the rule, not the guesswork. StreetSense breaks down Kansas law like this — the statute, the limit, and the charge that actually sticks — verified against the code and available fully offline on shift. Start the free trial.
StreetSense is an educational reference for law enforcement, not legal advice. State law changes, and your department policy may be stricter than the statute. Always follow your state’s current rule and your agency’s policy.
Spot an error? Email nick@mnsindustriesllc.com with the post and your source. Corrections to the app go out over the air. How we verify.